Legal Opinion

Pettit v. UnumProvident Corp.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided February 16, 2011No. 4:10-cv-21PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES E. GRITZNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Margaret Pettit (“Pettit”) filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, seeking judicial review of an appeal from the denial of long-term disability benefits by Defendant UnumProvi-dent Corporation (“Unum”). Pettit further seeks review of Unum’s calculation of benefits made payable as a result of her mental disability. The matter is submitted without oral argument on the administrative record and the briefs of the parties.

I. BACKGROUND

Pettit was hired by Great River…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rustad-Link v. Providence Health & Servs.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
  2. Murray v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API