Legal Opinion
Womack v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 1996No. 93-CF-1548PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court by Associate Judge SCHWELB.
Dissenting opinion by Associate Judge RUIZ at p. 614.
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On August 10,1993, following the denial of his motion to suppress an out-of-court identification, tangible evidence, and statements, appellant David Womack was convicted of rape while armed,1 possession of a firearm during a crime of violence or a dangerous offense,2 two counts of first-degree burglary while armed,3 two counts of kidnapping while armed,4 and three counts of armed robbery.5 On appeal, Womack contends that he was arrested without probable cause and that…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bennett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Maddox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hicks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.