Legal Opinion

Matter of a Member of

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 27, 2015No. 303, 2015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This in an attorney disciplinary proceeding involving charges of professional' misconduct against the Respondent, R. David Favata. A panel of the Board on Professional Responsibility (The “Board”) found that Favata violated the following Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct: one violation each of Rule 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly made a false statement of fact to a tribunal); Rule 3.4(e) (stated a personal opinion as to the credibility of a witness and/or the guilt of an accused); Rule 3.5(d) (engaged in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal and/or in undignified and discourteous conduct…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. In Re AbbottSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  2. In the Matter of a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  3. Matter of a Member of the Bar: LankenauSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Sandonato v. HorseySuperior Court of Delaware · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API