Legal Opinion

Preferred Physicians Mutual Risk Retention Group v. Cuomo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 20, 1994No. 91 Civ. 2733 (PKL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge:

This is an action brought by Preferred Physicians Mutual Risk Retention Group (“PP”) and U.S. Physicians Mutual Risk Retention Group (“USP”) to enforce their right to do business in the State of New York, as provided in the Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986, 15 U.S.C. § 3901 et seq. (“LRRA”). Plaintiffs have moved this Court for an order, pursuant to Rules 15(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, granting leave to plaintiffs to file an amended and supplemental complaint. Defendants respond, in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion, with…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oscar Productions, Inc. v. ZachariusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Fludgate v. Management Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API