Legal Opinion

Lint v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2008No. 33702PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Scott Lee Lint appeals from the district court’s order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Because we conclude that the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing on some of Lint’s claims, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Lint pled guilty to manufacturing a controlled substance, methamphetamine. I.C. § 87-2732(a)(l)(A). The district court sentenced Lint to a unified term of ten years, with five years determinate. Lint filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, which the district court denied.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Cullen R. Sims v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Black v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Meyer v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Stark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API