Legal Opinion

Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits International B.V.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 5, 2016No. Docket Nos. 14-4721-cv(L), 15-152-cv (XAP)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS JACOBS,'Circuit Judge:

Rival claims to the “Stolichnaya” trademarks have been asserted by an agency of the Russian Federation and by successors in interest to a Soviet enterprise. The principal issue is whether Federal Treasury Enterprise Sojuzplodoimport (“FTE”), an agéncy of the Russian Federation, has been endowed by that government with rights and powers that give it standing to pursue claims under section 32(1) of the Lanham Act (the “section 32(1) claims”). The question has been here before. We conclude that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Curley v. AMR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Corporación Mexicana De Mantenimiento Integral v. Pemex-Exploración Y ProducciónCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Leopard Marine & Trading, Ltd. v. Easy St. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. MMA Consultants 1, Inc. v. Republic of PeruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. Grgurev v. LiculDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Kashef v. BNP Paribas S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API