Legal Opinion
Millers Casualty Insurance v. Flores
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1994No. 20190PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Defendant-Appellant, Estefana Flores (“Flores”) appeals from a trial court order denying her motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas (“Millers”). The trial court concluded that an insurance policy issued by Millers to Dr. Harry Winkworth (“Dr. Winkworth”) excluded coverage for injuries that Flores suffered at the hands of Dr. Winkworth’s assistant. On appeal, we address whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Millers. We review this case under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Guaranty National Insurance Co. v. The North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- New Mexico Physicians Mutual Liability Co. v. LaMureNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Multnomah County v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Bell v. Sharp Cabrillo HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Alpha Therapeutic Corporation, Hunter Blood Center, Defendant/third Party v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yee v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Jefferson Insurance v. National Union Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- More Clinic v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- American Registry of Pathology v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Millers Cas. Ins. Co. of Texas v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.