Legal Opinion

More Clinic v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1998No. C2-97-1725PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. challenges the trial court’s declaratory judgment that appellant is liable to pay defense and settlement costs to its insured, respondent Mork Clinic. We affirm, finding no merit in appellant’s contentions that (a) alleged negligence of the clinic did not cause the injuries of patients who claimed that they were sexually abused, and (b) clinic liabilities incurred as a result of a physician’s sexual misconduct come within the medical services exclusion in its policy.

FACTS

Several former patients of an allergist employed by respondent…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Shelly Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Lancer Insurance Co. v. Garcia Holiday ToursTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  4. SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSMCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API