Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mooney

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1927No. 10324PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The validity of an ordinance of the city of San Antonio, Texas, is attacked. The ordinance denounces a negligent collision, and declares that:

“If any person driving or operating or in charge of any motor vehicle * * * shall, by negligence, cause or suffer or permit the same to come into collision with any other vehicle of any nature whatsoever, or with any animal, person, etc. * * * in or on any public street * * * or any public place whatever, in the- city of San Antonio, Texas, such person shall be deemed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Gill v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. City of San Antonio v. BesteiroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Ex Parte JonischkiesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Genusa v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Miks v. LeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Wingate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API