Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Mooney
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 16, 1927No. 10324PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus.
The validity of an ordinance of the city of San Antonio, Texas, is attacked. The ordinance denounces a negligent collision, and declares that:
“If any person driving or operating or in charge of any motor vehicle * * * shall, by negligence, cause or suffer or permit the same to come into collision with any other vehicle of any nature whatsoever, or with any animal, person, etc. * * * in or on any public street * * * or any public place whatever, in the- city of San Antonio, Texas, such person shall be deemed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Gill v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- City of San Antonio v. BesteiroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Ex Parte JonischkiesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Genusa v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Miks v. LeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Wingate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.