Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Jonischkies

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 1922No. 6462PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— This is an original application for writ of habeas corpus. Relator seeks relief against a judgment of the city court in the city of Yorktown condemning him tp pay a fine of five dollars and costs for a violation of the traffic ordinance.

The ordinance requires that one desiring to turn to the left at the point of intersection of two streets shall pass the center, point on the right before making said turn. It also provides that if “traffic poles” have been installed, that he shall pass the traffic poles before turning to the left. The complaint charges a failure to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Dallas Country Levee District No. 2 v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Potter v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Jones v. DexterSupreme Court of Florida · 1859

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Ex Parte WatsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Everman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  4. Ex Parte MooneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. A-Loaf Baking Co. v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API