Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 2002No. 54, 2001PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

The principal issue before us on this appeal is whether a person may be charged two times with possession of a controlled substance, under the same statute, even though the offenses occurred at the same time, in the same location and with one intended purpose. We hold that this is multiplicitous and violates the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentences for two counts of possession with intent to deliver cocaine. In all other respects we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court. We remand this case to the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. State v. MarloweSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Buckham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Raynes v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API