Legal Opinion

Bechik v. Handy Mattress Accessories Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 8, 1942No. 2257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for a bill of particulars in a patent suit.

While as stated in Selrite, Inc., v. Tropical Chair Co., Inc., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 438, patent litigation is sui generis, that does not justify the granting of all the demands herein.

Defendant’s contention that all the demands herein have been granted before does not convince me that some of them should be granted now. The practice be-, fore the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became effective was quite different than since that time.

Under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Selrite, Inc. v. Tropical Chair Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marvel Slide Fastener Corp. v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. J. D. Ferry Co. v. Macbeth Engineering Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Coyne & Delany Co. v. G. W. Onthank Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API