Legal Opinion

Blossom Farm Products Co. v. Amtraco Commodity Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 13, 1974No. 70 Civ. 4759 (DNE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:

Defendant has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) for leave to amend its answer to assert the statute of frauds as an affirmative defense to the third and fourth causes of action pleaded in the complaint, and if such leave is granted for the court to declare the answer so amended. Additionally, if the answer is declared so amended defendant moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) for summary judgment with respect to the third and fourth causes of action of the complaint. Federal jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1970) because plaintiff and defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Albert Roloff v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Grissman v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Urvant v. IMCO Poultry, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schwind v. EW & Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Schneider v. OG & C CORP.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. MacMurray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Angueira v. AriasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API