Legal Opinion

Ammundson v. Falk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1949No. 34,774PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiffs in separate actions recovered verdicts against the defendants for personal injuries sustained by Edith E. Ammundson as the result of an automobile collision and for consequential damages sustained by Irvin Ammundson as her husband. Defendants appeal.

The questions presented for decision are:(1) Whether a statement as to how an accident occurred by a party, who at the time of making it was too excited to tell how it happened, is admissible as an admission;(2) Whether the statement referred to in the preceding question is admissible as part of the res gestae; and(3)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Pacific Fire Insurance v. Kenny Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Gough v. General Box Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Terry v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. Suske v. StrakaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API