Legal Opinion
Doris Andrews and Otis Andrews v. Thomas H. Wilkins, Individually and in His Official Capacity
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 31, 1991No. 90-5225PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge MIKVA.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Doris and Otis Andrews brought this action against officials and representatives of the United States Park Police, United States Department of the Interior, and the United States, for the wrongful death of the Andrewses’ son, Gino Andrews (“Andrews”). The district court granted summary judgment against appellants on their claims of both constitutional and common law torts against appellees. After reviewing appellants’ allegations of error, we affirm the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Jackson v. City of JolietCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Emil Ewolski v. City of BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Christiansen v. City of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- District of Columbia v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Leonard Rollon Crawford-El v. Patricia Britton and District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.