Legal Opinion

Tenney v. Arnold

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.

The parties will be referred to as they were in the common pleas court.

The plaintiff, Jean Arnold, a minor, brought hex-action by her next friend to recover damages for injuries, which she claimed were caused by the negligence of the defendant, Sidney Tenney, in the operation of his automobile upon one of tlie streets of the city of Akron. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

During the trial, the plaintiff called the defendant for cross-examination, and by such examination developed the fact that soon after the accident the defendant signed a statement or report setting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Banks v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Rylee v. Bank of StathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Freel v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hunton v. Hertz & Hosbach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Moore v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API