Freel v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and. county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an action for damages for injuries done the plaintiff while endeavoring to get upon the car of the defendant.
Judgment was givén in favor of plaintiff, from which, *42and an order refusing a new trial, this appeal is taken. The only grounds urged for a reversal of the judgment and order are: —
1. That the court erred in compelling defendant’s counsel to give to plaintiff’s counsel certain written statements of employees of defendant in relation to the facts surrounding the occurrence which caused the plaintiff’s injury, which statements were in the possession of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- State v. DepoisterNevada Supreme Court · 1891
- Stokoe v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Rhoades v. SelinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1827
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.