Legal Opinion
Moore v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 28, 1907No. 214PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action for damages, from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. January 21, 1906.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The plaintiff was nonsuited, and he excepted. He objects to the process of legal mechanics by which his case was chopped off. As this mechanical treatment can only be applied *515in a ease so clear as to leave it beyond question that the plaintiff has nothing which it would be to his advantage to submit to the jury, and as the plaintiff in this case had proved the allegations of his petition, the question before us really becomes one as to whether the plaintiff selected the proper form of action; that is, whether he should have sued, as he did, because he was ejected from the train, or whether he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Morse v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Trustees of Chester Church v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Southern Railway Co. v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Fuller v. StillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Polhill v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Tenney v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1929