Linan-Faye Construction Co., Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Camden
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBecker, Circuit Judge
I join in Parts I, II, and III of the majority opinion. However, I dissent from Part IV because I do not agree that New Jersey would apply to this garden variety construction dispute between a builder and a local governmental agency precepts drawn from a potpourri of federal cases which amount at best to a hodgepodge, and at worst to a regime so inhospitable and unfair to small contractors who deal with government agen*934cies as to be inconsistent with New Jersey jurisprudence. Rather, I believe that New Jersey would apply its own law, which would not recognize the doctrine of “constructive…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- John F. Wroblewski v. City of WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Fred Piecknick v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.