Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Linan-Faye Construction Co., Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Camden

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 13, 1995No. 94-5193Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBecker, Circuit Judge

I join in Parts I, II, and III of the majority opinion. However, I dissent from Part IV because I do not agree that New Jersey would apply to this garden variety construction dispute between a builder and a local governmental agency precepts drawn from a potpourri of federal cases which amount at best to a hodgepodge, and at worst to a regime so inhospitable and unfair to small contractors who deal with government agen*934cies as to be inconsistent with New Jersey jurisprudence. Rather, I believe that New Jersey would apply its own law, which would not recognize the doctrine of “constructive…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. John F. Wroblewski v. City of WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Fred Piecknick v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API