Legal Opinion

In re Flynn

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Hearing upon an application for a mandamus to compel payment to relator for services claimed to have heen rendered as coroner’s physician.

1Opinion of the CourtGarretson, J.

The relator brings this proceeding to compel the comptroller to pay to him the sum of $500 as salary which he claims to be entitled to, as coroner’s physician in the borough of Queens, for the months of March, April, May and June, 1909.

Upon the hearing first had, William H. Hammack and Walter G. Frey appeared by counsel and asked to be permitted to intervene, and an order was thereupon made bringing them into the proceeding and making them parties thereto. The reason for the appearance of the interveners is that each claims to have a cause of grievance similar to the applicant against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Brown v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. People ex rel. Williams v. ZuccaNew York Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DawsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. In re NammackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API