In re Nammack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, James C. Oreelman, president, and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of March, 1911, as amended and resettled by two orders entered in said clerk’s office respectively on the 26th day of April, 1911, and the 5th day of May, 1911, granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
This is an appeal by defendants, constituting the municipal civil service commission of the city , of New York, from an order directing that a peremptory writ‘of mandamus issue requiring them to certify the name of relator as coroner’s physician upon the regular monthly payrolls of the borough of Queens, city of New York, for the. months from- July to December, 1910, inclusive. The precise question at issue is whether or not relator legally held the office of coroner’s physician in the borough .of Queens for the months for which he seeks to be certified. The office of coroner’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Schulum v. HarburgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- In re FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- In re of MacLeod v. McGuireNew York Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- People ex rel. Murphy v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Ascione v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Blyn v. BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1976