Legal Opinion

Piazza v. Young

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00180Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES PIAZZA, et al., No. 4:19-CV-00180 Plaintiffs, (Judge Brann) v. BRENDAN YOUNG, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVEMBER 6, 2020 I. BACKGROUND Defendant Adam Mengden moved to quash a subpoena served by Plaintiffs seeking discovery from the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”).1 Mengden argues that allowing the OAG to comply with this subpoena would violate the Pennsylvania Criminal History Records Information Act (“CHRIA”). Mengden asks this Court to issue an Order quashing the subpoena.2…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Warriner v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Great West Life Assurance Co. v. LevithanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Oehlmann v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Green v. CosbyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API