Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1974No. Docket 17889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Plaintiff wife herein obtained a judgment of divorce. Defendant husband moved for a new trial. The motion was denied. From that denial defendant appeals of right.

The precise issue on appeal is whether a party to a divorce action may be denied the right to testify in the proceedings because of failure to comply with a local court rule. The rule provides:

"No testimony shall be taken in such matters, except by leave of the court, until the attorneys have certified that attorney fees are paid.”

In this case the trial judge enforced the rule against the defendant husband who apparently had not paid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClung v. McClungMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Bylinski v. BylinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Catsman v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. DittonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Reed v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API