People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur Likine
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentMarilyn Kelly, J.
The majority advises that its view of parental responsibility and obligations leads it to adopt a new defense to the charge of felony nonsupport, the defense of impossibility to pay. I share the majority’s view of the responsibilities and obligations of parents. But there is an important difference between us. It lies in our respective interpretations of what defense MCL 750.165 allows a parent facing imprisonment for failing to pay child or spousal support. For reasons I will describe, I believe that the interests of children, as well as of all other members of society, are best served by…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.