Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1974No. Docket 17889Published

1Opinion of the Court

53 Mich. App. 625 (1974)

220 N.W.2d 199

REED

v.

REED

Docket No. 17889.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 31, 1974.

Korn & Burns, P.C., for plaintiff.

Williams, Coulter, Forster, Cunningham & Davison (by Douglas J. Read), for defendant.

Before: R.B. BURNS, P.J., and ALLEN and O'HARA,[*] JJ.

O'HARA, J.

Plaintiff wife herein obtained a judgment of divorce. Defendant husband moved for a new trial. The motion was denied. From that denial defendant appeals of right.

The precise issue on appeal is whether a party to a divorce action may be denied the right to testify in the proceedings because of failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClung v. McClungMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Bylinski v. BylinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Catsman v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Del Prado Motel, Inc. v. Charles J. Rogers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Reed v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API