Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Jose

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1943No. Civ. 3046PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and respondent Morrison prosecuted this action against defendants and appellants Corine Jose and A. D. Jose, for damages resulting from injuries received in an automobile accident. The respondent was an employee of Winnie Whitmore, upon whose dairy ranch he resided. Fred Lanagan was a truck driver for Mrs. Whit-more, and on the night in question he had possession of her pick-up truck. He invited Morrison to accompany him to Ford City, which is a few miles distant from her ranch. Corine Jose was the driver of a Plymouth automobile which collided with the pick-up truck which was being…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Blanton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bennett v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. KissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Curtis v. QRS Neon Corp. Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Johnson Trade, Inc. v. FrimmersdorfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API