Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Lynch
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 25, 2002No. C-01-3023 VRWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
By its complaint, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG & E) attacks the regulatory restructuring scheme California developed and later implemented for its electrical public utilities. PG & E names as defendants Loretta M Lynch, Henry M Duque, Carl W Wood, Geoffrey F Brown and Michael R Peevey 1 , in their„ official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). PG & E has moved for summary judgment on its first and second claims for relief (Doc # 111) while defendants have filed cross-motions for summary judgment or, in the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dauven v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- California Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Litigation Public Utility District No. 1 v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Monongahela Power Co. v. SchriberDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.