Legal Opinion

State v. $127,930 United States Currency

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2017No. 20170154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶ 1] -Anoulak Thornsavan appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress and from the civil judgment forfeiting $127,930 to the State. We affirm, concluding there was reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop and a Miranda warning was not required.

I

[¶ 2] In July 2015, Officer Mason Ware pulled over Thornsavan, along with his passenger, Saravanh Phommakhy, on Interstate 94. Ware stopped Thornsavan because it appeared to him that the car had excessive window tint. Prior to the stop, Ware checked the vehicle registration in his database, which indicated that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. $67,220.00 in United States Currency, Robert N. Easterly, Jr., Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MorsetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. SargentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. $127,930 United States CurrencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. MorsetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. MorsetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API