Brite v. Grubbs
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HENRY. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Henry County.— ITon. J. W. Boss, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNEy
The complainants, being owners of land within drainage district No. 1 in Henry county, filed the original hill for the purpose of enjoining the collection of a special or additional assessment to that provided in the original decree creating said drainage district.
Said drainage district was created by decree entered in the county court of Henry county'on. April 15, 1918. Said decree provided an assessment of $10 per acre on the six thousand seven hundred acres of land embraced within said district, and contained the following recital:
“And it appearing to the court from testimony introduced as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
- Mitchell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
- Darty v. DartyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
- Pritchard v. Johnson-Toby Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Board of Trustees v. Boards of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.