Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Cooney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1925No. Appeal, 136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Boger Cooney was the owner of a house in the City of Pittsburgh, and agreed to sell the same to Lawrence Bailey for $3,500, a part of the purchase-money being paid at the time. A contract to convey was entered into on October 1,1923. The name of the wife of the vendor did not appear in the body of the written instrument, though the attestation clause declares “that the said parties to this agreement have hereunto set their hands and seals,” and she joined in its execution. The wife was fully cognizant of the undertaking, as appears by the uncontradicted testimony;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Welsh Et Ux. v. Ford Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Strut v. HuseltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Haendler's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. McCoy v. NiblickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Paralka Et Ux. v. Grummel Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dondero v. TurrillasNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bricker v. KlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Prager v. WinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API