Legal Opinion

Haendler's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1923No. Appeal, 136PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The decedent and the appellant were married in 1911, each had been previously married and had children living, the fruit of such former marriages, and each had separate estates. They entered into a post-nuptial agreement, on July 25, 1911, declaring it to be the “wish and desire of said parties that the said marriage contract, as aforesaid, shall in no wise affect their relations with regard to their said separate and several real estate”; and in pursuance of the thus declared intention they entered into covenants which gave to each the use, ownership and control of all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Singer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Dillinger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. Tiernan v. BinnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Fennell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Ludwig's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bell's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Stull v. StullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Goeckel's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Williams v. WengerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Bailey v. CooneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API