Legal Opinion

State v. Diggs

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 1975No. 772, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.

Both the Court of Appeals and this Court have taken pains to persuade, expostulate, and warn bench and bar that the Maryland Rules of Practice and Procedure “are not guides to the practice of law but precise rubrics ‘established to promote the orderly and efficient administration of justice and [that they] are to be read and followed.’ ” Isen v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 259 Md. 564, 570, quoting Brown v. Fraley, 222 Md. 480, 483; Green v. State, 19 Md. App. 683, 687. It has been made abundantly clear that they are not apocrypha but “shall, when made, have the force of Law, until rescinded,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Porterfield v. Mascari II, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Dotson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. In Re Appeal No. 544, Term 1974Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. State v. MinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API