Legal Opinion

Porterfield v. Mascari II, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 2003No. 14, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

Deborah Porterfield (“Petitioner”) alleges that she was discharged wrongfully by her employer, Home Instead Senior Care (“Home Instead”), for implying an intent to seek legal advice before responding to an unfavorable work evaluation. Porterfield was employed as an administrative assistant by Home Instead from December 1997 through August 1999. After receiving a written “Employee Warning,” she informed her supervisors at Home Instead that she had been advised to consult an attorney before “formally responding” to the warning.1 Porterfield’s employment was terminated almost immediately. As a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Newell v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Pendleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API