Legal Opinion

Conseglio v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This is an action by six plaintiffs-brought on their behalf by the United' States Attorney under the provisions of' the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended,1 wherein they seek to obtain seniority status higher than that accorded to them by the defendant railroad upon their return from military service during World War II. The union-of which they are members has also been named as a defendant.

The plaintiffs seek relief pursuant to section 8 of the Act,2 which *569guarantees a re-employed veteran restoration to his former position without loss of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Felice Grillea v. United States and National Shipping AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michael Churma v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. George W. Bell, Jr., James E. Brewton, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Aerodex, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Hirschberg v. Braniff Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  5. Blair v. Page Aircraft Maintenance, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API