Legal Opinion
Crowley v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1944No. 167PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This action was commenced on October 20, 1941, by Mitsui & Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation, to enjoin the Commodity Exchange, Inc., and the Commodity Exchange Silk Clearing Association, Inc., from carrying out an alleged resolution of the Board of Governors of the Exchange of October 15, 1941, directing the liquidation and settlement of all outstanding raw silk contracts made on the Exchange at prices ranging from $3.55 to $3.65 per pound, and also to recover $150,949.50 paid to the Clearing Association by five brokers for the account of plaintiff as variation margins…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Yankton Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. . ProctorNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Thomson v. ThomsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,244 Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & NeufeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Daniel v. Board of Trade of City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Sam Wong & Son, Inc. v. New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- P. J. Taggares Co. v. New York Mercantile ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.