Hanley v. Pearson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Linda C. Hanley appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of John H. Pearson (“Pearson”). Hanley argues that the trial court erred by ruling that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 33-812(A)(3) (2000) did not require the trustee of a foreclosed deed of trust to apply excess sale proceeds to pay outstanding property taxes before paying monies to junior lienholders. Hanley additionally challenges the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Pearson. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s entry of summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Caruthers v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass'n v. OrlandiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- PNC Bank v. Cabinetry by Karman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.