Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

132 N.J. 339 (1993)

625 A.2d 1066

CAROL ANN FELDMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LEDERLE LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, A MAINE CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 1, 1993.

Decided June 10, 1993.

James I. Peck IV argued the cause for appellant.

William C. Slattery argued the cause for respondent (Norris, McLaughlin and Marcus, attorneys).

2Per curiam

We granted certification, 130 N.J. 399, 614 A.2d 620 (1992), to consider whether the Appellate Division had correctly ordered yet another retrial of this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. State v. WilbelySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API