Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kotoch v. City of Highland Heights, Unpublished Decision (8-12-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1999No. 74426Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

Appellants, Norman Kotoch and Bessie Russo, appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee, City of Highland Heights, and denial of partial summary judgment in favor of appellants. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Appellant Bessie Russo owns a property located at 351 Bishop Road, in Highland Heights, Ohio. Appellant Norman Kotoch owns an adjacent lot, located at 355 Bishop Road. Kotoch has an option to buy Russo's property. The lots were originally platted as 75 feet wide residential lots, but the zoning was changed to a Park…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Fort Frye Teachers Ass'n v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API