Legal Opinion

Hubel v. Dick

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 16, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.

The first of tbeso cases is a bill in equity, filed Feb-, ruary 26, 1884, to restrain the defendant from the alleged infringement of two letters patent, one being reissued patent No. 10,437,. granted to the plaintiff January 15, 1884, and the second, No. 275,-092, granted to Harrison H. Taylor, assignor to the plaintiff, April 3, 1888. Each patent is for a machine for cutting off gelatine capsules. The original Hubei patent was dated February 13, 1877. The first reissue, No. 8,44-0, was applied for August 17, 1878, and was granted October 1, 1878. The second reissue, and the one in, suit, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Mathews v. MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Ellithorp v. RobertsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ide v. Trorlicht, Duncker & Renard Carpet Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Pelzer v. MeybergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  3. Dodge v. PorterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
  4. Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. PelzerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  5. National Pigments & Chemical Co. v. Shreveport Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API