Legal Opinion
Jerome J. Steiker Co. v. Eccelston Properties Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*309OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter Tom, J.
Plaintiff Jerome J. Steiker Co., Inc. (Steiker) moves for summary judgment on the grounds that no triable question of fact exists, and that defendants’ affirmative defenses lack merit. Defendants cross-move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the doctrine of res judicata.
Steiker, a licensed mortgage broker in New York, is engaged in the business of arranging loans and other methods of financing for third parties, which loans and financing are secured by mortgages on real property. In or about July 1989, defendant Eccelston Properties Ltd.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Raffe v. John DoeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Flippin v. Wilson State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989
- Weldotron Corp. v. Arbee Scales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- M. J. Williams Corp. v. Roma Fragrances & Cosmetics, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Southmark Corp. v. Trotter, Smith & JacobsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.