Legal Opinion

Jones v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1924No. 6 Div. 908PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouudin, J.

The general purpose of the bill is to redeem certain properties and securities held by respondent as security for debt. To this end an accounting is sought to ascertain the amount of the indebtedness. Among other things, the bill seeks in the accounting to purge the debt of alleged usury therein. One of .the matters in which usury is alleged grows out of payments made by respondent as surety for complainant to the First National Bank of Rome, Ga.

In January, 1911, complainant, Jones, desiring to obtain a loan, procured the accommodation indorsement of respondent, Moore, upon a note of $5,000…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Pattillo v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. First Nat. Bank of Oneonta v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Locke v. KaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API