Hobbs v. Salem-Bedford Stone Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— This case has twice before been appealed. Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Hobbs, 11 Ind. App. 27; *437Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Hobbs, 144 Ind. 146. Upon the first appeal the judgment against the company was reversed because the evidence did not sustain the verdict, and a new trial was ordered with leave to amend the complaint. The complaint was amended, and another trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against the company, and, upon appeal to the Supreme Court, the judgment was reversed because of the insufficiency of the second paragraph of complaint. The complaint was again amended, and a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. OstranderIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Heltonville Manufacturing Co. v. FieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Matchett v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. HockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Bence v. DenboIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Craft v. StoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Scott v. BairdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.