Legal Opinion

Buckhannon & N. R. v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1905No. 553PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

The bill of Coster et al., trustees, was filed March 13, 1899, its purpose being the foreclosure of the underlying mortgage of the Parkersburg Branch Railroad Com*708pany, dated July 1, 1879. In accordance with the prayer of said bill, John W. Davis was appointed receiver of all the property of said railroad company, and he duly qualified as such officer. Pending the proceedings in that case the Buckhannon & Northern Railroad Company, on the 27th day of October, 1903, filed its petition therein, asking permission to institute and prosecute in the circuit court of Taylor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Diners Club, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, Trustee of Dashew Business MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Railroad Commission v. Alabama Great Southern R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  5. Field v. Kansas City Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API