Legal Opinion

Harris v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2011No. S156555PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

This litigation tests whether certain insurance company claims adjusters are exempt employees, not entitled to overtime compensation under the Labor Code and regulations of California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC or Commission). Reviewing the trial court’s denial of a summary adjudication motion, the Court of Appeal held the adjusters are not exempt employees as a matter of law. In doing so, the Court of Appeal misapplied the substantive law. We reverse.

FACTS

Plaintiffs are claims adjusters employed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Golden Eagle Insurance…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. California Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Rieve v. Coventry Health Care, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API