Central Ry. Signal Co. v. Jackson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by the Central Railway Signal Company and Frank Dutcher against George B. Jackson. On motion for order directing substituted service.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
It appears that a motion made in this case has not formally been disposed of. A statement of the record facts will present the purpose of the motion and effect of its allowance.
It is sufficient for this purpose to state that application was made for a patent, on a claimed invention of the plaintiff Dutcher, to the Commissioner of Patents. A like application was also made by the defendant, and an interference was declared, and an award of priority of invention was given the defendant. This proceeding passed through all the successive stages, original and appellate,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gandy v. MarbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armstrong v. De ForestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- United States v. Waverly ClubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
- Bunny Bear, Inc. v. Dennis Mitchell IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.