Legal Opinion

Medina v. Choate

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 14, 2017No. 17-1159PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Delano Medina, who is in custody awaiting a federal trial, filed an application for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking dismissal of the charges against him on the ground that he has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. He apparently proceeded under § 2241 rather than under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because § 2255(a) requires that he be “[a] prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress.” (Emphasis added.) He has yet to be tried, much less sentenced.

[i] The district court dismissed Defendant’s application for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Troy Reese v. Warden Philadelphia FDCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Alvarez-Caceres v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. Anaya v. CamposDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  4. BARNARD v. UNITED STATESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
  5. BROWN v. PISTRODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API