Legal Opinion
BARNARD v. UNITED STATES
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 13, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00257Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD, ) ) Petitioner ) ) v. ) 1:23-cv-00257-JAW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent ) RECOMMENDED DECISION AFTER REVIEW OF PETITION Petitioner, who is a federal pretrial detainee, seeks habeas relief in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, upon the filing of a habeas petition, the Court must conduct a preliminary review of the petition, and “must dismiss” the petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jones v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Troy Reese v. Warden Philadelphia FDCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.