Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1985No. 719, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellant, Gary Thompson, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City by Judge Robert M. Bell, sitting without a jury, of 1) possession of cocaine with intent to distribute; 2) possession of methadone; 3) possession of narcotics paraphernalia (hypodermic syringes); 4) possession of paraphernalia (packaging material); and 5) possession of marijuana. Upon this appeal, he raises two contentions:

1) That the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the convictions; and

2) That evidence seized from his briefcase should have been suppressed.

Sufficiency of the Evidence

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. State v. AmermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. State v. McGaghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API