Legal Opinion

State v. Amerman

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 30, 1990No. 715, 716, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The Theme

The controlling principle dictating this reversal of a suppression order is that when a judge, either at a pretrial suppression hearing or at trial, sits in review of another judge’s earlier determination that probable cause existed to issue a search and seizure warrant (or an arrest warrant), the reviewing judge sits in an appellate-like capacity with all of the attendant appellate constraints. Although he may ordinarily be accustomed to assessing probable cause as a matter of fact, he is in this less characteristic role called upon to assess it as a matter of law. The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Greenstreet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API