State v. Amerman
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
The Theme
The controlling principle dictating this reversal of a suppression order is that when a judge, either at a pretrial suppression hearing or at trial, sits in review of another judge’s earlier determination that probable cause existed to issue a search and seizure warrant (or an arrest warrant), the reviewing judge sits in an appellate-like capacity with all of the attendant appellate constraints. Although he may ordinarily be accustomed to assessing probable cause as a matter of fact, he is in this less characteristic role called upon to assess it as a matter of law. The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Greenstreet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.