Legal Opinion

State v. McGagh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 16, 2021No. 12/20PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Karen Campbell McGagh, No. 12, September Term 2020. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – STANDARD OF REVIEW – SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE – PERJURY – Maryland Rule 8-131 provides that an appellate court will not set aside the judgment of a trial court on the evidence unless clearly erroneous, and reviewing courts shall defer to trial court’s findings regarding the credibility of witnesses. Appellate courts apply a de novo standard of review when a trial court’s judgment on the evidence implicates the defendant’s constitutional rights. Following a bench trial, the trial court…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Howling v. State Abongnelah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Koushall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Callaway v. NineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  4. Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  5. Covington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API