State v. McGagh
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Karen Campbell McGagh, No. 12, September Term 2020. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – STANDARD OF REVIEW – SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE – PERJURY – Maryland Rule 8-131 provides that an appellate court will not set aside the judgment of a trial court on the evidence unless clearly erroneous, and reviewing courts shall defer to trial court’s findings regarding the credibility of witnesses. Appellate courts apply a de novo standard of review when a trial court’s judgment on the evidence implicates the defendant’s constitutional rights. Following a bench trial, the trial court…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Howling v. State Abongnelah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Koushall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Callaway v. NineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Covington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.